Reviews for Shinigami Eyes
Shinigami Eyes by Shinigami Eyes
Review by deadeyejay
Rated 1 out of 5
by deadeyejay, a year agoUsed to be good but recently seems to be poorly moderated, I have seen people who are blatantly trans friendly from one look at their profile marked as red for no reason? Who is approving this? If I can tell a person is trans friendly then a moderator whose job it is to do this definitely can. And if I am doing your job for you and better than you, then I may as well not be using your services.
Hopefully these instances are just a mistake or a dip in quality of moderation which is fixable, but from looking at other reviews it seems to be related to some discourse? Sorry are we in primary school? I do not partake in or follow online queer discourse could you imagine. But to self-sabotage and ruin a good reputation of something marginalised groups rely on as a lifeline in an often volatile and uncertain online sphere, over something as arbitrary as online discourse of all things is beyond petty and childish, it is dangerous and spreading misinformation.
Keep your discourse to reddit ot twitter or whatever people who argue on the internet use, and away from tools that actual adults use to keep themselves safe online. If you cannot moderate your own add-on properly and maturely, then don't bother keeping it up at all because something that is based on trust, fairness and common sense is rendered useless if you cannot be any of those things. Or better yet find someone who can be those things instead. I'm not saying this should be gone, I'm saying it needs someone who will moderate it properly or it may as well be gone. or a better alternative developed.
Not gonna bother using this anymore unless this addressed/fixed, as a queer person I know how to navigate the internet with my own senses and will happily do it again. But persecuted groups are relying on you and you are letting them down and contributing to already rampant harmful misinformation about them, which is the unforgivable part for me. And for what. Fix or I will drop and I hope others do too. Queer people deserve way better than this and way better than you who sells them out over internet drama apparently, along with your own integrity. Sad for queer people and embarrassing for you. Grow up and sort it out.
Hopefully these instances are just a mistake or a dip in quality of moderation which is fixable, but from looking at other reviews it seems to be related to some discourse? Sorry are we in primary school? I do not partake in or follow online queer discourse could you imagine. But to self-sabotage and ruin a good reputation of something marginalised groups rely on as a lifeline in an often volatile and uncertain online sphere, over something as arbitrary as online discourse of all things is beyond petty and childish, it is dangerous and spreading misinformation.
Keep your discourse to reddit ot twitter or whatever people who argue on the internet use, and away from tools that actual adults use to keep themselves safe online. If you cannot moderate your own add-on properly and maturely, then don't bother keeping it up at all because something that is based on trust, fairness and common sense is rendered useless if you cannot be any of those things. Or better yet find someone who can be those things instead. I'm not saying this should be gone, I'm saying it needs someone who will moderate it properly or it may as well be gone. or a better alternative developed.
Not gonna bother using this anymore unless this addressed/fixed, as a queer person I know how to navigate the internet with my own senses and will happily do it again. But persecuted groups are relying on you and you are letting them down and contributing to already rampant harmful misinformation about them, which is the unforgivable part for me. And for what. Fix or I will drop and I hope others do too. Queer people deserve way better than this and way better than you who sells them out over internet drama apparently, along with your own integrity. Sad for queer people and embarrassing for you. Grow up and sort it out.
1,358 reviews
- Rated 5 out of 5by awawa, 2 hours ago99% of the 1 star reviews are from pissy mens rights activists who are upset they or their fellow transmisogynistic friends got marked red. It is a good extension for sniffing out transphobia, specifically, transmisogyny. To anyone on the fence, please disregard the reviews from bigots.
- Rated 5 out of 5by sara, 19 hours ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17289853, a day ago
- this add-on is actually rlly reliable if you fully comprehend *why* the people who are marked red/green are marked red/green. it's not about whether or not you're "nice" or are "normal," it's about whether or not you're safe for trans people to be around; specifically, *transfeminine* people, as they are the most vulnerable members of the trans community, and anyone who isn't safe for them shouldn't be considered "trans friendly." that's really all there is to it. useful extension!!! although i agree with people who say it would be nice to know why certain people were marked red/green, the context would be useful too
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19830850, a day ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19829880, 2 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by oMorri, 2 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lavender, 6 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Heather, 9 days ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Talon, 11 days agouseful for news websites or social media users, completely useless for tumblr. normal people are often marked red while extremely aggressive people are sometimes marked green. discourse stances shouldnt be a measure on minority discrimination.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19809155, 13 days agothe 1-star reviews complaining about transmasc and intersex people getting marked red fail to consider WHY they get marked red (hating trans women)
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17727821, 14 days ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by mystieneko, 16 days agolots of false flags, intersex people and trans men are almost always marked red while transmisandrists are marked green
- Rated 1 out of 5by thevdsasff, 16 days agoused to use this religiously after it first came out and at first it was genuinely useful. now after discovering i'm intersex i try to go to any community for the topic anywhere and everyone is marked red because our discussions of gender and sex don't 100% align with the mods views (which then gets called transmisogynist, when nobody is saying anything of the sort at all). this includes a disproportionate number of transfems, so the claims that simply being transfem will get you marked green are false. i have, however, seen people get marked within days of making an account somewhere *just because they are posting in intersex spaces*. so do with that information what you will. i personally never plan on using the extension again, i'll vet people myself
- Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 19803232, 16 days agoAbysmal tool if you genuinely care about safety from transphobes. There is a mountain of examples where people who spew intersexist, exorsexist and antitransmasculine hatred 24/7 get to secure their "safe" marking while painting their trans siblings who won't stand for that as the real transphobes.
- Rated 1 out of 5by frak, 17 days agoThe Wikipedia page for gloves is marked green but only in spanish and asturian, this thing has no moderation whatsoever
It also says a lot that most of the recent 5 stars reviews are "you're just mad you're transmisogynistic and got flagged red LOL!" but never address the racism and the transphobes being flagged green complaints that they're responding to
I've also just noticed that the website got updated since when I first installed this addon and lists "theyfab" as a "community infighting" term when I've only ever heard it being said by TERFs. It's an enbyphobic slur and it's clearly transphobic - Rated 1 out of 5by Firefox user 17409768, 18 days agoThis extension- as many others have already pointed out- is no longer accurate or curated in any shape or form. I've used it for many years now, and I just keep catching false flags, especially on tumblr. Not worth the download in 2026
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 17939446, 19 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Glossopetrae, 20 days ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by Spider-Man, 20 days agoI wish there was a way to see why someone is marked as pro or anti trans. Like a quick description "Posts hateful comments on twitter" or "Regularly Advocates for trans rights during live streams"
- Rated 2 out of 5by rani, 23 days agoWhile at times very good, the community-sourced data on tumblr is prone to bad information from TERFs, false flags from petty infighting, and racism. Often, a trans-friendly and specifically transfeminine blog will be removed by community flagging for having affiliated with any other blog that does not subscribe to specifically radical transfeminist theory. The review process simply cannot keep up with the type of flagging system it has. I also still have concerns over how in the past, attempts to flag exorsexist and otherwise 'truscum' blogs were thrown out, and concerns about exorsexism as a form of transphobia were dismissed for potentially muddying the water in flagging transmisogynists. I'd honestly rate this app at a 3 were it not for its claims of being concerned with transphobia or anti-LGBTQ+ sentiments as a whole, when many reviewers and users will tell you that the extension was always only intended to report transmisogyny.
- Rated 4 out of 5by OscineAves, 25 days agoDespite what other reviews will say there's very few false positives or false negatives if you're a regular person engaging in regular circles.
It won't be a problem unless you engage in chronically online discourse, in which case you can easily use your critical thinking skills to determine for yourself whose on your side and change them to green for yourself. - Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 19304457, 25 days agoon a lot of websites it seems fine, but its completely useless for tumblr. anyone supporting trans men gets marked red.
I don't know why other reviewers are saying this is false, I guess they don't use tumblr?