Reviews for NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite by Giorgio Maone
Review by Max
Rated 1 out of 5
by Max, 9 months agoI really wanted to use NoScript. I prefer single-purpose extensions that focus on doing one job well, compared to more multi-purpose extensions like uBlock Origin.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript.
However, I ultimately couldn't stick with it because the user experience did not suit my needs.
E.g. one mobile screen presents around 12 different icons packed into the height of 3 lines of text, leaving a large portion of the screen completely empty below them.
My main frustration is that none of these icons have labels. Expecting users to learn and memorize the meaning of a dozen different unlabeled symbols creates an unnecessary barrier to entry and makes using the extension quickly and efficiently very difficult. It feels counter-intuitive to leave so much screen real estate blank when that space could be used to label each icon and explain its function.
uBlock Origin is easier to use than NoScript.
2,420 reviews
- Rated 1 out of 5by Beauleau, 8 days ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Maximilien Perron, 8 days ago
- Rated 4 out of 5by Firefox user 18127040, 20 days agoТакие прям зайки и лапочки... Разместить закрытие окна приветствия и "Пожертвовать" чуть ли не с наложением друг на друга. Эдакое "Ну, даааааайти деняяяяяях!". Звезда в минус.
Аддон классный, но не нужно быть, как эти. - Rated 5 out of 5by Sunny, 21 days ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19664008, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Firefox user 19487299, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Ryan Steed, a month ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ZeroUnderscoreOu, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dzluck, 2 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Bob, 2 months ago
- Rated 1 out of 5by mlatpren, 2 months agoIt does a great job at blocking, but is regularly frustrating with re-enabling things. It's supposed to show you what it's blocking, but that's extremely hit-or-miss. Occasionally, there'd be something blocked where the only solution is to disable the extension. As in, right-click and disable *from Firefox itself.*
- Rated 3 out of 5by zekromVale, 2 months agoThere needs to be a CPU limit on this extension, using 30% CPU of an intel i7 11th gen laptop CPU on YouTube is ridiculous. Firefox for Ubuntu snap, flatpack, or just .deb are affected. Must disable NoScript to fix it or allow everything fully for all domains on the page. I would like more domains to be added to the global trusted list though (by default) or have a popup at the top when you first visit a page.
- Rated 5 out of 5by Hopeavirta, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Lazy Cat, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by sumobunny, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Zelgadis-San, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Dadou, 3 months ago
- Rated 3 out of 5by aq, 3 months agoUser for at least 15 years, Something is conflicting on Firefox. It is blocking scripts and other add ons such as tampermonkey or violentmonkey with scripts added, but without any listing of what is being blocked. Only option is to shut it off to proceed.
Even blocking games internal scripts without any 'monkey' in use.
Please check and test - Rated 5 out of 5by Simon Bünemann, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by ADKFZ8O, 3 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Marw, 3 months ago
- Rated 2 out of 5by Firefox user 15990777, 4 months ago
- Rated 5 out of 5by Arman Daneshjoo, 4 months ago