unreliable these days since a lot of people are getting marked red despite being very trans-positive or even previously marked green, and a lot of random people suddenly turning green despite not meeting any requirements. moderation should step up imo.

at one point it seemed decently reliable, but i just saw the entire wikipedia dot org article for okra - yes the plant/food - flagged as transphobic so i uhhh. i have very VERY serious doubts about how well moderated (if at all) the submissions are anymore

Not accurate and relies on feelings instead of facts, what one person thinks is fine another will freak out over. Reviews can't be fact based on something that doesn't rely on facts.

Unless they implement a feature to see what post/reasoning was used to justify the red label, and importantly with sources, then this is only going to be a hindrance to have installed if you want to find non-bigoted people. It's wrong worryingly often.

Unless you talk exclusively about issues relevant to transfemmes, then you're marked as transphobic. They're also way too quick to flag transfemmes as green just for simply being trans, often transmedicalists (aka people who think you're only "allowed" to be called trans if you get full gender affirming care, with all the gender affirming surgeries + HRT) will slip through and be green.

Likely that the people controlling it have serious biases against transmasc and enby people. That or the extension is entirely unmoderated, and has become compromised by automation/people doing false marks.

it is hardly ever accurate and mainly boils down to things the creators just disagree with

I still use it because it's the only option out there. Maybe one day it will get better and I'll change my rating back to 5 stars that it used to deserve

dead